Goldstein Hall’s Litigation Team, led by Senior Associate Peter M. Rivera, secured Summary Judgment, dismissing claims brought against a small community church in an action for specific performance, brought by an alleged purchaser of the church’s property in Brooklyn, New York.  The Motion for Summary Judgment, entered in Kings County Supreme Court, was the culmination of five years of litigation on this matter.  It concerned the intricacies of mutual mistake of fact when two parties enter in to a contract for the sale of real property.

Specifically, the Court determined that the church was entitled to Summary Judgment because a substantial fact, which formed the underlying basis of the transaction, was based upon a mutual mistake.  Goldstein Hall’s Litigation Team, following discovery, was able to find and introduce vital information that benefitted the Church regarding the parties mutual mistake.  The Court decided that no further triable issues of fact were needed for it to rescind the contract and dismiss the complaint in favor of the church.

For more information regarding this matter, or our Litigation services, please contact Peter M. Rivera, or your Goldstein Hall Attorney.

_____________________________________________________________________

Goldstein Hall PLLC is a full service real estate law firm with a concentration in affordable housing and community development. Since our inception in 2006, we have been proud to continue to enhance our reputation as a smart, reputable, and responsive firm that believes our achievements are deeply rooted in the community and in your success.  Our Litigation Team expands upon our focus of servicing the real estate professional and regularly litigates in the areas of CommercialReal Estate and Construction Law.

This Client Alert was prepared as a service to clients and other friends of Goldstein Hall PLLC to report recent developments that may be of interest to them. The content is general and for informational purposes only, and should not be considered or relied on as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.